Producer and director Aaron Woolf’s new film “King Corn” has provoked a rich debate among moviegoers about the wisdom of U.S. farm subsidies, but taking on big corn was so difficult  it has left him poor. 

The film profiles two recent East Coast college graduates, who after reading reports of the declining nutritional value of U.S. food,  move to Iowa to grow one acre of corn.

The neophyte farmers attempt to follow the corn they grow from the field to the plate and don’t always like what they see.  Family farmers tell them that U.S. subsidies and competition from big farms cause them to grow “the poorest quality corn the world’s ever seen.”  The two young men visit Colorado feed lots where scientists tell them that corn feed causes so many ulcers in cows that farmers have to pump them full of antibiotics. They go to Brooklyn, New York where doctors tell them that consumption of “liquid candy” soft drinks made with high fructose corn syrup have helped lead to high rates of diabetes in the city where one in eight people suffer from the disease.

Woolf said at a showing of the film at the Reuters Americas headquarters in New York this week that the film is $100,000 debt.  “This was a film that was really really hard to raise money for,” he said.  He said he could not afford to take on agricultural giants like Cargill and ADM in the film because, “It’s very hard to make a documentary in America and get corporate buy-in.”

Now Woolf has to moonlight in order to get back in the black, but he’s still concentrating on food – in a the next few weeks he will open an organic grocery store in Brooklyn.